Pension sharing orders
A percentage of one pension is transferred into a pension in the other person’s name. A clean break — each of you controls your own pot from that day on.
Sharing is the most common route today because it gives both people certainty: the receiving party gets their own pension, invested and accessed on their own terms.
The percentage is set by the court, but what that percentage is worth in real retirement income depends on how the receiving pension is invested, charged and accessed — which is where advice earns its keep.
Pension offsetting
One person keeps their pension; the other keeps assets of equivalent value — often the home. Simple on paper, easy to get wrong in practice.
Offsetting trades a pension (taxable later, growing, hard to value) against assets like property (accessible now, differently taxed). Comparing the two fairly is genuinely difficult.
A pound of pension is not worth a pound of house. Getting the adjustment factor wrong can cost either party tens of thousands over a retirement — this is the option where independent analysis matters most.
Pension attachment orders
Part of one person’s pension income or lump sum is paid to the other when it comes into payment. Less common now, but still seen in older arrangements.
Attachment (previously “earmarking”) leaves the pension in the original member’s name — so the receiving party has no control over when it is taken, and payments can stop on remarriage or death.
If you have an existing attachment order, or one is being proposed, it is worth understanding exactly what it does and does not protect before anything is finalised.